8 Best Bill of Lading OCR Tools (2026 Compared)

If your team processes more than a few dozen bills of lading per week, you've probably looked into automating the data entry. The question isn't whether to automate, it's which tool to use. We tested and researched the most popular BOL OCR and extraction tools to help you make the right choice for your operation.

Why Freight Companies Need BOL OCR

Every load that moves in the US generates at least one bill of lading. For LTL carriers, brokers, and 3PLs processing hundreds or thousands of shipments per week, that's a massive volume of documents that need to be digitized.

The economics are straightforward:

• Manual cost: $5-15 per document. At 15-30 minutes per BOL for data entry and verification, plus a fully loaded labor cost of $20-30/hour, each document costs $5-15 to process manually.
• Error rate: 1-4%. Manual data entry introduces errors in weight, freight class, reference numbers, and addresses. Each error triggers downstream costs: re-bills, shipment delays, billing disputes, and customer complaints.
• Volume multiplier. A mid-size brokerage processing 500 BOLs per week spends $2,500-7,500/week on manual data entry alone. That's $130,000-390,000 per year in labor, before counting the cost of errors.
• Break-even. Most automated tools pay for themselves at around 100 documents per month. If you're processing more than 25 BOLs per week, automation is almost certainly cheaper than manual entry.

What to Look For in a BOL OCR Tool

Not all extraction tools are created equal. Here are the features that actually matter for freight documents:

The 8 Best BOL OCR Tools

1. CapyParse

CapyParse is a self-serve document extraction platform that uses AI (not templates) to extract structured data from BOLs, rate confirmations, and other freight documents. Upload a PDF, get a spreadsheet. No API keys or developer setup required.

Pros:

• No coding or API setup required; upload and go
• AI handles variable layouts without template configuration
• Built-in confidence scoring flags uncertain fields for review
• Works on scanned, photographed, and digital PDFs

Cons:

• No API access yet (coming soon), upload-only for now
• Newer to freight documents specifically (strong on financial documents)

2. Veryfi

Veryfi offers pre-trained OCR models specifically for logistics documents including BOLs, packing slips, and shipping labels. It's API-first, designed for developers building integrations.

Pros:

• Pre-trained on real-world BOL formats with good out-of-the-box accuracy
• Fast API with good documentation and SDKs
• Also handles receipts, invoices, and other logistics docs

Cons:

• Requires developer setup, no self-serve UI for end users
• No built-in review workflow, you need to build exception handling

3. Mindee

Mindee provides document parsing APIs with pre-built and custom models. Their shipping and logistics models handle BOLs along with 50+ country-specific formats.

Pros:

• Transparent per-document pricing
• 50+ country formats supported, good for international freight
• Custom model training for unique document types

Cons:

• API-only, no self-serve upload interface
• Custom model training requires labeled training data

4. Extend

Extend uses large language models (LLMs) for document extraction, claiming over 95% accuracy. They include a human-in-the-loop component for exception handling.

Pros:

• Very high accuracy with human fallback for edge cases
• LLM approach handles variable layouts well
• Managed service with less operational overhead for you

Cons:

• Custom pricing requires sales call, no transparent pricing
• Enterprise-focused, may be overkill for small brokerages

5. Nanonets

Nanonets offers pre-trained and custom OCR models with a no-code workflow builder. Their logistics models handle BOLs, packing lists, and shipping labels.

Pros:

• Zapier and webhook integrations for workflow automation
• Built-in review and approval workflows
• Custom model training without coding

Cons:

• Paid plans start high ($499/month), expensive for small operations
• Pre-trained BOL model accuracy can vary on non-standard formats

6. Klippa

Klippa offers document processing APIs covering 15+ logistics document types including BOLs, CMRs (international consignment notes), and customs declarations. Strong in European and multi-language contexts.

Pros:

• 15+ logistics document types supported (BOL, CMR, customs docs, etc.)
• Multi-language support, important for cross-border freight
• GDPR-compliant European hosting option

Cons:

• Custom pricing requires sales engagement
• More focused on European document formats

7. Parseur

Parseur uses a template-based approach where you define extraction zones on a sample document. It then applies those templates to future documents. Supports 60+ languages and integrates with Zapier.

Pros:

• Very high accuracy when the template matches
• Good integrations (Zapier, Google Sheets, webhooks)
• Transparent pricing tiers

Cons:

• Breaks when document layout changes, requires template maintenance
• Each new sender/format requires a new template setup
• Not practical for operations receiving BOLs from many different carriers

8. Shipamax (WiseTech Global)

Shipamax is an enterprise platform for freight document processing, acquired by WiseTech Global (makers of CargoWise). It parses email attachments automatically, handling BOLs, commercial invoices, packing lists, and customs docs.

Pros:

• End-to-end automation: parses emails, extracts data, pushes to TMS
• Handles BOLs, commercial invoices, packing lists, customs docs in one platform
• Deep CargoWise integration (same parent company)

Cons:

• Enterprise sales process, not accessible for SMBs
• Pricing not publicly available
• Overkill for operations that just need BOL-to-spreadsheet

Comparison Table

How to Choose the Right Tool

The right tool depends on your team size, technical resources, and document volume:

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Articles